Our attributions from Topic 4.1 often lead us directly to our attitudes. An attitude is a set of feelings and beliefs that generally guide how we react to specific people, objects, or events. Psychologists view attitudes as having three main components: affective (how we feel), behavioral (how we act), and cognitive (what we believe). In this topic, we will explore how we form these attitudes, how outside influences can persuade us to change them, and the psychological tension that occurs when our attitudes and actions don't align.
Every day we are bombarded by attempts to change our attitudes, whether it's a politician asking for our vote or a commercial convincing us to buy a new product. Persuasion generally travels through two main pathways:
Beyond general persuasion, social psychologists study specific strategies people use to get others to comply with their requests. Understanding these phenomena can explain how small actions drastically alter our long-term attitudes:
What happens when our actions directly contradict our deeply held beliefs? According to psychologist Leon Festinger, we experience cognitive dissonance. This is a state of psychological tension or discomfort that occurs when a person holds two inconsistent thoughts or when their behavior is contrary to their attitudes.
Because humans hate this feeling of tension, we are highly motivated to resolve it. We typically do this not by changing our behavior (since it already happened), but by rationalizing our actions or entirely changing our underlying attitude to match what we just did. Example: You believe cheating is morally wrong, but you peek at your neighbor's test anyway. To reduce the guilt (dissonance), you convince yourself that "the test was unfair anyway, so it doesn't really count as cheating."
Our attitudes are profoundly shaped by the social roles we step into. A role is a set of expectations about how people in a specific social position should behave. When we adopt a new role, we quickly adopt the attitudes that accompany it.
The most famous (and highly controversial) demonstration of this was Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment. College students randomly assigned to be "guards" or "prisoners" quickly adopted the aggressive or submissive attitudes expected of those roles, taking the simulation so seriously that the experiment had to be shut down early. It revealed a striking truth: what we do, we gradually become.
The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Power of Roles. Conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, this landmark study randomly assigned roles of guards and prisoners to college students in a simulated prison environment. The experiment demonstrated how powerfully assigned social roles and situational variables can compel individuals to conform to expected behaviors, often overriding internal personality traits. The rapid internalization of roles, sometimes leading to abusive or compliant behaviors, highlights critical concepts within AP Psychology's exploration of social roles (Topic 4.2).
⚠️ Foot-in-the-Door vs. Door-in-the-Face: Students frequently mix up these compliance strategies on the exam. A helpful trick: The Foot-in-the-Door starts small (like just getting your foot across the threshold) and gets bigger. The Door-in-the-Face starts huge (so big the person slams the door in your face) and gets smaller to ask for a compromise.
Persuasion strategies and cognitive dissonance are AP Psych staples. Test your understanding of attitude formation before you move on to group dynamics: